Thursday, October 21, 2010

Fahrenheit 451 Pgs 41-68 Fishbowl/Liveblog Discussion--Period 4

218 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that at some point Guy really loved her but when he met Clarisse he saw that the love he had for Mildred had deteriorated

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Haley. Clarrise was the one that sparked his memory into that state of mind where he actually figured out what love was. Now we can see this because Mildred and Montag are already getting along better.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Are marriges arranged or are they like they are today? Because feelings are not a focus in this society so it may be a very superficial marrige arangment.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I do not believe that Guy actually ever loved Mildred because he did not really have emotion until Clarrise brought his true emotions out.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What does love mean in a society with no shown emotion?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Clarisse shows Montag the depth to himself, Mildred is just his wife. Clarisse represents this wonderful transition for him, his wife shows him what he was before this change.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree with Garrett I think he just married milderd as a way to fit in

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think that meeting Clarisse, even though he doesn't love her, made Montag realize he isn't in love with Mildred.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I agree with megan, he needs someone to think like him, and without clarisse he need to teach mildred like clarisse tought him.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yeah--so seperate beds. Isn't a king size bed basically seperate beds?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think that Guy wanted to know when they met to renew the emotions that he may or may not have ever felt. He just wants to find a happiness that Clarrise showed him he did not have. They are kind o fseperated throughout the whole story and it doesn't seem like they interact like a married couple does today.

    ReplyDelete
  13. i believe they were arranged because he didnt really believe that he loved her and she didnt know what love meant... also when clarisse pointed out with the dandelian that he wasnt in love because up until then he didnt know or feel love

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think that marrages mean something different for us than they do for people in the book. Emotions aren't really a key part of their lives, but emotions are one of our main focuses. I think Montag wanted to marry Mildred but didn't ever actually love her.

    ReplyDelete
  15. ya its so big that you have a ton of space to yourself

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think that Clarisse might have "opened a door" in Montag, and he is starting to realize that he may not really be happy. Afterall...he said "I am not happy. I am not happy"

    If the society doesn't know what love is...then the seperated beds make sense, they may be too afraid to be outcasts in society, and open up to each other enought to truly love on and other.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Back to what they said about Mildred and Montag really being in love. I think that there society doesn't fully understand the meaning of true love and that every couple may be like that. They are just going through the motions of live and they think they truely love each other but they really don't.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Does the society have as shallow marrages like Montaq and Mildrid or is all the shallowness in their marrage because of Mildrid?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Off of what Kelsie said in the inner circle--do you sometimes feel that in you classes you are just learning facts (memorizing words) to pass the test and you are not really gaining knowledge?

    ReplyDelete
  20. I think that the purpose of them finding the books was to make the plot show that they might be growing closer togethor now that Clarrise is gone and Guy knows about feelings.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Good point Moritz. Yes in a way a king sized bed is bigger but you still get that picture that a couple that has a king sized bed would symbolize a picture of unity rather that two complete seperate beds...

    ReplyDelete
  22. "all men are created equal" but are they really... some are more athletic and some are smarter but in this book they try to make it so that they all ARE equal

    ReplyDelete
  23. Lise what mrs.Moritz said i think you can get on autopilot in class and i think the society is too

    ReplyDelete
  24. What could be some of the reasons that people are filled with facts but really aren't taught to apply them?

    ReplyDelete
  25. I think alot of times in our society, we just go through the motions to get things over with. Montag doesn't really love Mildred, but getting married is just what you do.

    ReplyDelete
  26. To answer Mrs.Moritz's question-Yes. I was just thinking about that. If we are really learning for the purpose of learning, why do we have grades, tests, etc? Most students I know learn the information for just long enough to use it, then it disappears.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Moritz, I think that a lot of the time we learn facts that don't bennifit us any. We go home and memorize facts so we can get good grades, but really that's not helping most kids gain real knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I contemplated the meaning of the smell of kerosene as well. I believe that the meaning of the smell getting to him is to show a guilt since the old lady died.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I think that the change in smell from "perfume" to making him vomit showed that his heart changed and he realized that he really didn't like his job and realized that when he was trying to help the community he wasn't.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Happieness depends on the person. For soem happiness is different than others. Also. contentment is much differant that happieness

    ReplyDelete
  31. All men are created equal, but don't have to be treated equal. The society can claim equality, becuase all men are created equal.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Like they said in the inner circle i think he realizes he isnt just burning books hes burning sombodies life.

    ReplyDelete
  33. he liked change.... but what happened to that liking? once he met clarisse he changed alot... like kelsey said did his point of view changed on bieng a firefighter?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Is it Clarrisse's death that makes him want to take out the books or was it Clarrise's life?

    ReplyDelete
  35. I believe that at this point of the story (with Clarrises death) Guy starts to think more and more about his emotions and how he interacts with Mildred.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Kelsie had an intersting idea that people can feel smart but they really arn't... so in school we learn many facts, and some deeper thought happens but...do you feel smarter knowing the meaning of life (deeper thought) or 17 causes of World War 1(fact)?

    ReplyDelete
  37. I think getting run over by a car is an easy out for the government to get rid of her

    ReplyDelete
  38. I think that all men are created equal but if someone is smarter than another and can find new discoveries, society needs to acknowledge that and not make the smart one dumber than the other.

    ReplyDelete
  39. daniel... i think it was the way she made him realize these different things

    ReplyDelete
  40. Haley: I dont think she is dead because since the government was dealing with it she may be locked up somewhere because someone found out she had books... and being questioned... Just a thought

    ReplyDelete
  41. Not to be mean, but for the story's plotline, i think it is better off that Clarisse is out of the picture. Now Montag can take control and he has to do it alone. He doesn't have Clarisse to lean on, he has to be his own person...make the change himself.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Is there really a government? It seems that this society doesnt need any governing force other than fire fighters.

    ReplyDelete
  43. In response to Ms. Moritz's question, I think that a lot of the time all that is required is that you memmorize is the facts, and this is why people lose their love for learning and see it as a chore. If you can stick to this depth, the work does not seem pointless, but the problem is that the depth is no longeer required to get by, and so many students lose their love of learning when it is no longer an expectation to enjoy what they are learning, solely to get a good grade so that they can move on. Learning is more than memmorizing words, but you are not required to learn - only memmorize.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I didn't understand that part at all, do they kill each other for fun?

    ReplyDelete
  45. I think that Clarisse's death was not an accident because her and her family were becoming more and more suspisous to the government and it was just easier for the government to say it was an accident rather than them trying to get rid of her.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I agree with mikaela Clarrise was the start of his transformation but he has to do t he rest himself

    ReplyDelete
  47. I agree with Mrs. Moritz that someone really want to get to someone or something they could find a way to do it and make it look like an accident.

    ReplyDelete
  48. @Mikaela--I agree with you. Bradbury brought her in to serve the purpose of getting Montag thinking. Sadly, then, she wasn't imporant.

    ReplyDelete
  49. I think that there is a government because I think that the firefighters would have to get the permission to burn from someone unless they are the government.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I think that some outside force must have been the cause of her death. I dont however believe that it is the government that commited the murder ( if it was murder) because the government doesn seem to be prominant in the story but careless teenagers have been mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Megan said something about people killing each other, why is this acceptable? It doesn't seem like anyone is trying to change that fact, so why is it okay?

    ReplyDelete
  52. I find it interesting how Guy reacts to Clarisses dealth, he wants to brush it off his shoulder and gets very adgictated when Mildered brings her up... is he trying not to except the fact of her leaving/dealth or does he know other wise of how she died (maybe not an accident)?

    ReplyDelete
  53. the firemen are like the ss to me they just enforce the laws so they are the law

    ReplyDelete
  54. A "car accident" is an easy cover-up for the death of someone they have been unhappy with for a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  55. It does make it sound like the government does control much more land than they portray. The people that seem in charge sound like the fireman

    ReplyDelete
  56. Bradburry also predicted another thing correctly: The goverment has too much power!

    ReplyDelete
  57. I think that the censorship of books started with the people because they sort of censored it themselves by forcing the government to eliminate offensive books.

    ReplyDelete
  58. I agree with abiie is it that common that people are killed? or is it just played down to seem ok?

    ReplyDelete
  59. Didn't Beaty say that the newpapers and companies like that started shortening books? Wasn't that the start of censorship?

    ReplyDelete
  60. I agree with Mikaela that once Clarrise's usefulness in the plot is used up then she is eliminated for the sake of simplicity.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Garrett good point the government has barely been mentioned, so how is it obvious that they were the cause of her dealth? Reckless teenager is as likely as government.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Griffin, you said that the firefighers were law-inforcers, I think that the firefighters are the closest thing to government that we know about.

    ReplyDelete
  63. No one is given more than one side of an issue, and therefore they never argue. But who decides what side of the story people get?

    ReplyDelete
  64. I think it is common that people are killed because it talks about how the kids in their society are very reckless and don't even think about if what they are doing is right.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Daneil I don't think it was nessasarly censorship, it is just conforming to whta the people wanted.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Are firemen abusing their power when they read the books?

    ReplyDelete
  67. To add to what i just said, doesnt that mean that neither the government or the people started the censorship?

    ReplyDelete
  68. Why does censoring books affect their society so much? If our society censored books, there would still be ways of gaining knowledge and creating ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  69. I dont understand how the society is functioning if things are eliminated that are offensive. Isnt everything offensive to someone????

    ReplyDelete
  70. I dont think the shortenig was the start of the censorship it was just to keep up with the speed of life

    ReplyDelete
  71. Fireman are abusing thier power because they are the ones reading what is supposed to be burned by them...

    ReplyDelete
  72. We seem to be censoring ourselves. Like Beatty says, we shorten everything, need instant gratification, etc. This just allows real censorship to occur more frequently, and easier.

    ReplyDelete
  73. I think that the owners of the books would be irritated if the people that are burning and outlawing books are reading the books that were theres.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Why would a fireman want to read a book that could possibly change him if he loves his job of burinig them?

    ReplyDelete
  75. when the firefighters read the books the start to learn more than the people do and this isnt fair because then they may change their decision about burning books. have they all read a book AT some time or another?

    ReplyDelete
  76. Jack: If they shorted the books, they choosef that to take out! Is that not censorship?

    ReplyDelete
  77. i dont think the fireman are abusing their power the just are hipocritical

    ReplyDelete
  78. Connection:
    If Clarisse's death was on purpose, it could be similar to the many deaths in Macbeth. Someone was hired to kill someone else to make their life eaiser. Macbeth hired people to kill King Duncan to make the pathway to the thorne simple and clear. In Fahrenheit 451, someone may have killed Clarisse on purpose to make it easier to enforce NO BOOKS! Clarisse may have begun to rub off on people,and they may realize the situation and take action. I think it is really logical that Clarisse was killed purposeful, because she had a good, strong way of makeing people (such as Montag) realize the problems in a society and want to make a change. I don't think that the government could control everone (no matter the size of government or city) if they all decided to be against them...and make a change.

    ReplyDelete
  79. DANEIL its just con forming to what teh public wanted. They didnt want to read 500 pages but they wanted to read the book!!

    ReplyDelete
  80. To Rebecca's post I think that there is some form of government outside of the firefighters because I think that there would be some sort of an uprising if the firefighters just made the rules and decided that they'd burn the books

    ReplyDelete
  81. I think that the fireman are aloud to read because they cant get to the substance of the book in only 24 hours.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Moritz, I think they are abusing their power by reading the books. They are the ones going out and burning homes and books, it's very hypocritical of them to be reading what they're trying to get rid of.

    ReplyDelete
  83. @Jack, but like Dan said, that is censorship, isn't it though?...

    ReplyDelete
  84. I do think that there is some sort of underground group that gives the books and is trying to reestablish what they know has been in the past.

    ReplyDelete
  85. The firemen's curiosity is sparked by their proximity to books, and that this is why books are acceptable for them and not others. the point is to get rid of curiosity.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Jack: I agree that they are conforming to what the people want, but the newpapers are desiding what to take out that still is censorship on the media's part.

    ReplyDelete
  87. I think that Beatty saying that they are allowed to read is a sort of trap for the firemen

    ReplyDelete
  88. some rules are made to be broken

    ReplyDelete
  89. Do you think that there could be some long lasting "war" that the firemen have been waging to eradicate the books and the people that have them?

    ReplyDelete
  90. Beatty did seem fairly clam about the whole situation. (might he be part of the supposed underground society or is he just used to the whole thing)

    ReplyDelete
  91. I think the reason that teenagers dont read the books is because they didn't grow up with them so they don't know the importance of them

    ReplyDelete
  92. he had 24 hours to get rid of the book? how should he read that fast or was that the point?

    ReplyDelete
  93. DANEIL: WRONG! They dicide what to take out but what they take out is the parts the public doesnt want to read!

    ReplyDelete
  94. I agree with Rebecca. They are given special privileges due to the nature of their job. They constantly work with books and must be naturally curious.

    ReplyDelete
  95. @ Mrs. Moritz -
    I don't think the fireman realzie the power they have...or how strongly they are enforcing the no books law. I think that the curiosity in a younger fireman such as Montag is a more powerful thought than just the knowledge of a job.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Jack: who is to say what the public doesnt want to read?

    ReplyDelete
  97. Garrett, you said that you think there is an underground circulation of books, and I agree. How else would people be getting books and have the ability to read them? Also, in a world of no books, how do people still know how to read? Is reading and writing still taught to people?

    ReplyDelete
  98. Maybe the fireman are just to guilty about the steeling of a book to get anything out of the book.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Firemen are given a grace period with "accidentally" taken books and on top of that they are not given a fair punishment. Firemen should have no special treatment they are citizens and deserve to be treated the same. The old women I do not think would be angry because of the fact that the fireman's curiosity could lead to more and more happening dealing with books it has to start with someone in power (firemen). She died for her cause thats what she wanted to do and if her cause was that important to her, anyone driven to take a book and read is a-oaky with her even with out punishment because those people can make things happen.

    ReplyDelete
  100. I don't think that there can be a war in the traditional sense of the word, the firemen just see it as restoring order.

    ReplyDelete
  101. DANIEKL: the public says, with thier reviews and complaints.

    ReplyDelete
  102. To Alyssa: I think that the point of only giving them 24 ours is to make them rush through it or not finish it because if they don't understand the plot they may see it how Beatty is trying to make them see books as.

    ReplyDelete
  103. Beatty knew about the history of firemen and books because when he was a firefighter earlier he did take books from the houses they burned, read them, and then burned them.

    ReplyDelete
  104. why should you hate? its a strong word!!

    ReplyDelete
  105. Does our society shun people who are different?

    ReplyDelete
  106. Alyssa, the point of only having 24 hours to keep a book was that they wouldn't be able to read the whole book, only parts of it.

    ReplyDelete
  107. So would montag ever have gotten the chance to read these books? and would he have been changed in the same way?

    ReplyDelete
  108. i agree with garrett and abby theres always a black market for a wanted item

    ReplyDelete
  109. In addition to my last comment -
    I didn't mean that they didn't realize their job (obviously they were enforcing no books, because they were burning houses), but I think the firemen may just do their job...just like every other person. I don't think that they are constantly questioning their part in society and how it is effecting every indicidual.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Didn't they have 24 or 48 hours? So if they didnt finish it in 24 they had more time?

    ReplyDelete
  111. I think it does Daniel because people who are "dumb" or "ugly" are generally the people that someone sees and automatically decides that they don't want to be around them.

    ReplyDelete
  112. I think that Beatty is just so veteraned that he has seen this all before!!

    ReplyDelete
  113. if montag reads these books would he change into one of the people he has burned, would mildred be the same if she read it?

    ReplyDelete
  114. i think he collected them from his fire missions over his time as a fireman as a trophy of sorts

    ReplyDelete
  115. I agree with Abbie that the 24 hour grace period for the fireman is short enough that they can't get too much out of the book.

    ReplyDelete
  116. Knowledge is power the more educated you are the more intune you are with what is going... which may make you question athority and the way of doing things, keeping the people uneducated about important issues reduces the chances of them rebelling agains the type of society they have and the authority that controls them.

    ReplyDelete
  117. I think that we do, I mean think about how we, as a culture place empahsis on being attractive and "cool", and make being smart and unahthletic bad. And that spreads to schools and those who are not "cool" are picked on and shunned

    ReplyDelete
  118. How do we decied GOOD or BAD characters? Is it towards what we think or how they are in the story? How...how?

    ReplyDelete
  119. Daniel: I do think that our society shuns people who are different. Even if you just look around you can tell that there is a want to belong, and that is what their society is - the culmination of all that want to belong. Now they are left with the few people that want to be different that they must supress so that the rest can belong.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Do you think that mabye beatty is putting on a face and he is possibly like montag?

    ReplyDelete
  121. So if Mildred really does read these books with Montag, is she going to get in trouble for that, or is it justified because her husband is a firefighter?

    ReplyDelete
  122. I think Beatty is playing a game with montag, trying to make him feel like he doesnt really know anything. Beatty is trying to get Montag to be the "regular" fireman, like Clarrise told Montag about. Montag is different and has a purpose and Beatty is trying to destroy it.

    ReplyDelete
  123. I dont really think that Beatty is being a friend to Montag but rather warning him of bad things that will ensue the reading of books because he knows that Montag wont listen.

    ReplyDelete
  124. Good point Nicole. An informed public has the ability to create change, which is not what whoever is in charge wants.

    ReplyDelete
  125. To Mikaela: I think generally we decide if a character is "good" or "bad" after the first impression we see of them.

    ReplyDelete
  126. What happens if a person, like Montag, was found with books? He is sorta important to running society...would they punish him?
    Will people find out about his stash?

    ReplyDelete
  127. Obviously Beatty rules by fear. Could he possibly go home at night, crack open a cold beer, and sit down and READ? He does seem untouchable.

    ReplyDelete
  128. I dont know if this is relevant but what if Beatty killed Clarrise to keep Montag out of danger.

    ReplyDelete
  129. How many members of the society actually think it's perfect?

    ReplyDelete
  130. Mikaela: I think that the author of a book writes their characters in a certain way, and a lot of the time they see them as good or bad, but they do give their characters depth that allows readers to see the characters in a different way based on their own experience.

    ReplyDelete
  131. he might and that might be where his superior attitude comes from

    ReplyDelete
  132. i believe he could but he doesnt feel safe doing that

    ReplyDelete
  133. IDEA!!!:
    BEATTY WOULD BE A GREAT CHARACTER TO HELP MONTAG MAKE A CHANGE!!!! He is a big, powerful figure in society.

    ReplyDelete
  134. I think he may or if not he is not opposed to books as much as he says he is, i think he knows montag ahs books and will gonna let him.

    ReplyDelete
  135. I think that he does have that authority and there probably wouldn't be a way for the others to find out. Maybe Beatty really believes what he says about how books are really nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  136. Beatty to me seems like a captain that is also a father figure, and just warning Montag about what would happen to him if he got involved in the illegal book viewing, by telling him the history about the society with books but in a way that does not to shun or admire it just in the middle, knowing who Montage is and what he will take away from the story he told is to be carfull by keeping books at an arms length and maybe slowly bring them closer.

    ReplyDelete
  137. I agree with Griffin, maybe he knows he's not going to get caught with books so he reads, which fuels his attitude toward everyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  138. I think it is a strong possibility that Beatty reads. He is clearly more educated in history than others. He knew who Master Ridley was and claimed to be "full of bits and pieces". Where else could he pick up these tidbits?

    ReplyDelete
  139. @ Corey -
    But how do you decide good/bad by first impression?
    How the look? What they do? What they say?

    ReplyDelete
  140. Is Beaty the one who is setting the hound on Montag?

    ReplyDelete
  141. I dont think that Guy really puts Mildred as his priority of thought at this point. I think that he could care less about Mildred.

    ReplyDelete
  142. i dont know if he ever knew her i think he thought he did when he didnt

    ReplyDelete
  143. te first impression can be voice, look, clothes, anything

    ReplyDelete
  144. Beatty does rule with fear in a sense, but he also uses the want they all have to belong in society to keep control.

    He also has a very intese hatred of books, but he must also care about them deep down, and see the love people have in books, and this is the source of his hatred.

    ReplyDelete
  145. Daniel, that's a good question. Maybe Beaty is setting the hound against Montag so he won't get caught himself.

    ReplyDelete
  146. Death is viewed as OK.
    They don't care as much about each death, as we do today...Do you think our society will come to that? I hope not :(

    ReplyDelete
  147. I think that Montag is crying because he is very overwelmed at the fact that he doesn't fully love his wife and he has been just wearing a mask for so long that when it is taken off he realizes that he actually was wearing a mask.

    ReplyDelete
  148. This society looks upon people and books as expendable. People in-People out.

    ReplyDelete
  149. Montag talked about how burning books is more than just burning pages but more like burning somebody and their ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  150. Ok then why would beatty do do that, set the hound on montag?

    ReplyDelete
  151. I agree with Zach.
    Beatty does know more than everyone. How?

    ReplyDelete
  152. its also the directors point of view

    ReplyDelete
  153. Jack, I think he set the dog agianst Montag so that the dog won't go after him for reading books, which is why Beaty is wanting Montag to read....

    ReplyDelete
  154. Burning People = Burning Books, well Montag did say that he felt bad burning book that people spent their life on and poured their hearts out in, behind books are people, so they are the same thing Burning Books is essentially burning someones thoughts as well as who they are so burning people happens before they die when their books are burning their purpose for living is nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  155. I don't know...maybe I am insensitive, but I really don't see a need for a big ceremony and a place to lay my deceased body. After I am dead, I don't really care...BUT, I do see the need for people who are left living to have this ceremonial conclusion. So, is the book really so wrong in that aspect?

    ReplyDelete
  156. i agree with Mrs. Moritz its a lot more cot effective the way they do it

    ReplyDelete
  157. I kind of agree with moritz what if the government or whatever just doesnt want people to dwell on the deceased life's?

    ReplyDelete
  158. Thats what i asked, but i think i agree with abbie and daniel he is probably trying to keep that knoledge to himself, so he feels different in a society when people are the same.

    ReplyDelete
  159. i agree with moritz and griffin, it does make sense

    ReplyDelete
  160. I feel like it's important to have a funeral for someone who has passed, it's kind of a sign of respect for that person and love, even though they're not going to know.

    ReplyDelete
  161. Hey if Beatty set the hound on Guy then did he know about the stash behind the ventilator grill

    ReplyDelete
  162. @ Mrs. Moritz -
    I think it's ok what they do with the bodies, but I do agree that it our society the still living people want a last goodbye. But in this society...other people aren't as affected by one's death. So they burn them, and don't feel the need for a ceremony.

    ReplyDelete
  163. They don't really care about anything, hence their lack of emotion surrunding death and books. They want to belong, and have sacrificed everything for this. Yet, because of this there is nt really anything to belong to.

    ReplyDelete
  164. Abbie - But those people don't really care like people in our society do about the deceased.

    ReplyDelete
  165. the lack of emotion reminds me of spock only logic

    ReplyDelete
  166. Montag he is dragging his wife into this because he doesn't want to be turned in by her or he wants to start over their relationship where they are on the same page?

    ReplyDelete
  167. I think that the fourth wall would just complete her world and she would "interact" with them and feel apart of them.

    ReplyDelete
  168. If the society has been this way for a long time than doesnt there have to be someone making more books or they would all be gone.

    ReplyDelete
  169. are the tvs like a play and speak in turn or..?

    ReplyDelete
  170. I think that fuenral is unessasary unless the person asked for it. Its a big deal, and many just want people they love to pay thier respects not a group of relations you may or may not have loved or even talked to.

    ReplyDelete
  171. I agree with Maria that he had to get her involved because she had felt the figure of the book and he needed her to go along with him or else it was probable that she would tell on him because their relationship isn't very strong.

    ReplyDelete
  172. Mikaela, I know that they don't care in their society, but I think that is a symbol for how they feel for everyone else, they've lost the respect we have, and are slowly losing, for people

    ReplyDelete
  173. I think funerals are way to sad. Those types of funerals I could deal without. If a funeral is celibrating a life and show the good things thatthe person did, I think it can be a very good thing for the people who were close to the deceased. So, i think the funerals are good but not for the deceased...

    ReplyDelete
  174. There has to be children...the society has to go on after they die...afterall death isn't as big of a thing.

    ReplyDelete
  175. Griffin: I disagree with your spock reference. It isn't that he has no feeling, just that he supresses his feelings, and this is just what the people in this society have done.

    ReplyDelete
  176. Kara, Thats a good point. if mildred wanted a family, why don't they have kids?

    ReplyDelete
  177. I agree with Jack because people's lives aren't valued that much anyways so what's the use of having a funeral when cares.

    ReplyDelete
  178. If they are capable of having children then why havent they do they really have any emotion for eachother

    ReplyDelete
  179. The 3 walls why didn't the author already have 4 walls of t.v's? Because the 4th would completely close her in from redemption into connecting with her husband and that she would not be able to convert to read the books with Montag because she would be completely surrounded by media telling her to be an anit-book person.

    ReplyDelete
  180. i think graces question was good sometimes you dont want to know the answers to a question

    ReplyDelete
  181. I think that Clarisse was happy but deep down she knew she was in trouble and was going to get punished sometime

    ReplyDelete
  182. I think that Clarrise wasnt ever going to be happy unless she could spread her ideas to everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  183. That is true Garret because usually having children is a sign that a couple has emotions for each other and they decide that they want to care for someone with each other

    ReplyDelete
  184. Whoa Cori thats not what i meant, life matters but i only want people mounring me to whom MY life mattered.

    ReplyDelete
  185. Is our society that different from Mildred? Don't a lot of people sit in front of a tv all day or play COD or whatever form of entertainment they choose.

    ReplyDelete
  186. I don't think that Montag was really overwhelmed (like said in the inner circle),he was reminded, and his eyes were opened.

    ReplyDelete
  187. Maybe Mildred is afraid of children..in the sense of responsibility and a connection to Montage.

    ReplyDelete
  188. You are driving me crazy. Can everyone please use proper grammar, spelling and punctuation.

    ReplyDelete
  189. I think that Clarisse was only truly happy when she had someone to share her feelings with.

    ReplyDelete
  190. i dont think mildred is the motherly type she'd probably get sued for neglect because she would forget she had kids

    ReplyDelete
  191. I agree with Daniel. Our society is not that different than Guy's. Our's may not be as extreme, but we still do many similar things.

    ReplyDelete