Friday, January 7, 2011

1984 pgs 147-224 Fishbowl/Liveblog Per. 3

53 comments:

  1. I do think that what the government says is what needs to be followed. They are in control over the people that have voted the government in to power. The people who gave control need to be willingly following

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that Obrien is a suspicious character. With the book, Winston already new the information but it took him reading it to realize that he new it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maybe Winston stopped reading right as the book was about to tell him why because he was scared to know. Like the knowledge would get killed even faster.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think that he stopped reading because I don't really think he wanted to know, because if he finally found out then he would have nothing to go off of.

    ReplyDelete
  5. He stoped reading because the author wanted to build suspense.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought it was interseting how when the speaker was giving his speach, he was able to change the enemy of ociana, without a realization by the citizens.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Like Joe just mentioned... i think that people can be afraid of the truth. When he stops reading and he is just about to find out what is going to happen, that is very significant to the story. People are afraid of the truth sometimes, although most are eager. Why isn't he eager and wnating to learn more? what is he afraid of? I feel that this is foreshadowing something that may appear in the book. what is int he book?!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think O'brian is part of the thought police, because going back way to the beginning of the book he made eye contact with Big Brother when he was giving one of his seminars.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think that Winston stopping his reading is symbolic of what he might find later on in the book. I think that Obrien might be someone who is deep undercover as an agent of the thought police to get the people that are to clever for the normal thought police.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Maybe the thought police thought that Winston and Julia would lead them to others.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The government doesn't need evidence to arrest someone. They just disappear.

    ReplyDelete
  12. @Maria- Just what I was thinking. Do you think there are many others just like them?

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. When you are capture by the gov. in this story you DIE!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think that the government is going to kill them, because it's kind of like back when Hitlar was in power, when him and other leaders like him destroy all opposition to their leadership.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think that the whole society turns on itself and wants to not turn one another in but they feel obligated to or else they could be arrested too. This society just wants to care for themselves and not others.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think that like Michael said, the government wants to break them with a force and prove a point to other rebels. Does the government use the same technology to change a person's identity such as the process O'Brien explained? If so, rebels who are captured could possibly go through this process.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Corbin--sex for pleasure is a crime; sex for the party (to create more members) is a duty

    ReplyDelete
  19. Isnt the bigger punishment forgetting who you are and losing all your free thought then dieing.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I think they are really destined to be killed. Along wsith what Rheana said: If they did kill all these people, what would they do with all the bodies? Just bury them? Because then someone could find them...

    ReplyDelete
  21. Doublethink is what makes the society so complex. Unless someone is like Parsons, and a total believer of the system, people who are not, like Winston, will eventually be broken down.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I agree with Kai, when people go to an antique store, they are obviously interested in the past, why else would they be going to an antique store? The government does use this as bait and it is a nasty way to catch poeple who are intruiged by the past and ask the question WHY?

    ReplyDelete
  23. O'Briens job is to fool people by getting close to them and gaining their trust.

    ReplyDelete
  24. The affection for Julia was there at first because she was rebellious. However, when Winston found out that she really did not care about the rebellion, only about self-preservation, he almost gave up on her.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Isn't it interesting that the gov. captures the people that are total believes of the system, like Parsons, when they could focus their energy on thers like Winston.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I think that O'Brian's job is to get people to admit that they are plotting against the government so that they can bag them and demolish the people that might potentially rebel.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I think Julia actually could have a purpose to corrupt lots of people for the Thought Police and just get inside people's minds.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I could see Julia as part of the thought police because she said earlier in the book that she had been in other affairs. Could she have turned in those other guys?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Winston and Julia's whole purpose to their relationship is to rebel. They knew that from the beginning that they were going to die. It was only a matter of time. So if they went to live with the proles, life would be meaningless because they still do not love each other.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I agree with Katie when she said that they wouldn't love eachother if it wasn't forbidden. I think the fact that they are rebelling while being togeter is fueling their love.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I think that the reason winston and jullia don't just go join the proles is that they can use their governmental power to rebel more succesfully.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Since the brotherhood doesn't even know all the members then could the thought police not know that Julia was a thought police? (If she was..)

    ReplyDelete
  33. I think Julia and Winston's position in the government is what influeced their rebellion. They were aware of the corruption in the government, causing them to think about the unjust nature of the government.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Maria- But what if Julia is kind of like a hooker and just has sex with innocent guys that the government suspects are going to rebel?

    ReplyDelete
  35. I think that Julia is more like Clarisse. They both just care about being more free and different. But, Montag and Winston actually do somethinig about it.

    ReplyDelete
  36. We really don't need to focus on the proles. Winston is captured and can't leave now.

    ReplyDelete
  37. We mentioned that Julia might be setting Winston up, but with this book taking as many weird turns as it has, what if Winston is actually setting Julia up???

    ReplyDelete
  38. I take back what I said earlier about the government killing people. I think the government takes the rebels and uses a sort of doublethink to change them and make them a new people. Then they just put them back into society.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Personally I don't think that the war is all that important. I mean, the government uses other means to suppress their people, so I don't think that the government invented the war.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I don't believe that the U.S. government is at all like this system but we are suppressed from some information.

    ReplyDelete
  41. @Garret- For what purpose would he be setting her up?

    ReplyDelete
  42. i think that this story will end in a failed rebelion which will lead to the death of winston and his affiliates.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @Corbin--From Winston's point I think that's how he viewed their relationship; Julia could have been a hooker spy for the government. I guess we will find out who she really was.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I do believe that the government shelters and does not expose all information to us. As Chloe mentioned with the internment camps. I had never heard of that before either and everything that we learn is from our perspective. There are tons of other persepectives of all of these events in history. Purging history is a disgustingt thought to me. I want to know and I want to learn more about what has happened in the world. It scares me to think thatthis information can and will be destroyed.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I think that people need disaster and war to think about. Think how weird life would be without those worries.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I think it is earlier to accept the Holocost and war and stuff here because WE didn't personaly endure it. We believe a lot happened, but it didn't happen directly to us, in American.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Every country tries to teach that they are "the best" and in 1984 it says the other countries lied to their people who lived there as well.

    ReplyDelete
  48. No matter what we learn it will be from one dimension. No matter what we do we will always learn one side.

    ReplyDelete
  49. We will always be supresed from somethings. I mean, we shouldn't believe that the gov. should give us viewing rights to Top Secret documents.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I think it's really scary how much America relies on other countries.

    ReplyDelete
  51. It's so scary how much every country is in debt (especially America)

    ReplyDelete
  52. The down turn to the economy is good for those who were already in a good spot, but for those who weren't, it is a terrible thing. They have to pay more for things they already couldn't afford.

    ReplyDelete