Friday, January 7, 2011

1984 pgs 147-224 Fishbowl/Liveblog Per. 4

98 comments:

  1. If they have one spy toying with the public they most definatly have more

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think he was trying to squeeze as much info out of them as he could so he could make sure that noone else is a co-conspirator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think that Charrington thought that he could catch them doing something more rebellious, so he waited to see.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And of course, maybe Charrington let it play out for the sake of having more to charge them against. Maybe secure their immediate execution.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Maybe Mr. charrington was trying to see what they were trying to do anyway. He know that he will eventually catch them but he wants to see what julia and winston are up too.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mr. Charrington went along for so long because he is a spy and is supposed to be undercover. If thought police were revealed, then there wouldn't be many crimes committed around those police because the people that are guilty would be vaporized instantly.

    ReplyDelete
  7. mabye they want to see what will happen and anticipate the next upriseing thingy and so better prepare themselves to deal with the issue.

    ReplyDelete
  8. He had to find what they knew, who else was involved, their motives, etc. They also used the information that they learned from spying on them while Winston was being interrogated. The more they know, the more ammunition they have against him, and the easier it is to break him.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So couldn't anyone be thought police...in disguise?

    ReplyDelete
  10. The thought police are everywhere undercover acting as normal proles and party members. But why did they wait so long to arrest Julia and Winston?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Maybe Charrington knew they were in the "Brotherhood" and he wanted to get more information about it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I think that the government really does set people up so they are definately going to be caught.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Megan, maybe they wanted more information about the Brotherhood

    ReplyDelete
  14. @mikaelam yes that's right, that's why they are undercover and not revealed as thought police. If nobody knows who is thought police and who isn't, they most likely won't do anything bad because of the risk that the person next to them may be watching them.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I agree with Zach. They needed to know all the information that they could possibly obtain.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Mr. Charrington made sure that Winston and Julia were committing thoughtcrime. I think he let it go on for long enough that Julia and Winston also knew what they did wrong, there is no way of escaping if he let it go on long enough.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Kelsi, why would they interrigate Winston for more information on the Brotherhood?

    ReplyDelete
  18. So is the theory of the brotherhood real, or just another part of the ruse to trap them?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Well, at the beginning of the book, I thought Julia was a member of the government. Anyone in this society could be pretending...

    Is the brotherhood even real?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Maybe O'Brian was already being watched, so when the brotherhood became stronger, the thought police had a way of finding others.

    ReplyDelete
  21. If all of these people are secretly with the government and trying to catch people, how would anyone ever change or do something illegal. Who can Winston and Julia trust

    ReplyDelete
  22. I definitely think that O'Brien gave him the book in order to assist, so to speak, in the catching of Winston and Julia. And that book is just all the more wrong that they have done according to society.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @Mikaela, well the thought police are everywhere. And like Mrs. Moritz said, O'Brien might have had something to do with it

    @Abbie, maybe they think that Winston and Julia know more about the brotherhood than they actually do

    ReplyDelete
  24. But griffin, wouldn't they take down the whole "brotherhood" if he was a person who was trying to bust people.

    ReplyDelete
  25. What if there is no brotherhood? The party could easily make something like that up to lure unloyal people in. it could be just like one more trap.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I think that he set them up because he knew that Winston was already doing things that he wasnt supposed to be doing.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I think O'Brien might actually be a party member whose job is to catch people like Julia and Winston who are against the party.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Maybe they were suspicious of O' Brian and they detected who was in contact with him. This could have lead to the thought police to winston and julia.

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Sydney, I have the same question, is the Brotherhood real, and if it is then how does the Party know about it?

    ReplyDelete
  30. I agree with Emily. Because Mr. Charrington let it go on so long, there is no way of denying that they were commiting crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  31. How much of the Brotherhood do you think is actually real? Versus people pretending...like being part of the Thought Police?...

    ReplyDelete
  32. I agree with Jack. The Brotherhood is a perfect method for the government to capture rebels.

    ReplyDelete
  33. @Jack if the Brotherhood is not true then why would they allow the books to circulate and the truth to be shared?

    ReplyDelete
  34. There is a question on the back board that says, "why does Julia only care about things that effect her directly?" Any thoughts??

    ReplyDelete
  35. I think that anyone could be fake....

    ReplyDelete
  36. Also, the recognition of the brotherhood by O'Brian may be to comfort Winston into giving up his secrets.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I think that Julia could definitly be part of the inner party. She would be the perfect person to pull men in.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I think Julia's rebellion is skin deep. Winston cares deeply about the Brotherhood, and Julia doesn't seem to truly care. She loves the idea of rebellion, that is what initially drew her towards Wiston. But being uninterested as she seems to be with the bigger picture, i can't help but wonder what her true intentions are...

    ReplyDelete
  39. Well I didn't see the whole Charrington-is-Thought-Police coming, so I wouldn't rule out the possibility of Julia being in on it too.

    ReplyDelete
  40. It's absolutely possible that Julia could be a member of the inner party. I don't think it's going to happen, but it could happen. Mr. Charrington waiting long enough to catch Winston and Julia, so Julia could be waiting for the right moment to capture Winston. I haven't had a very good feeling about Julia since she came into the book...

    ReplyDelete
  41. I think that yes, Julia could potentially be part of the Thought Police because she has done it so many times, and coincidentally has never been caught.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I think is WAY too much wokr for one man. why would they waste 2 thought police on one man. This wen ton for a t least a month.

    ReplyDelete
  43. They can't trust anyone, even eachother. the only safe place is with the proles. They were bound to get caught at some point, from somebody.

    ReplyDelete
  44. But IS she a rebellious or is it just her job?

    ReplyDelete
  45. I think that Julia is a part of the inner party because they don’t act like they truly love one another. She is rebellious but maybe being a double agent is the rebellion in her life.

    ReplyDelete
  46. @Abbie Well if Julia is a part of the thought police, then maybe she just doesn't want to discuss the government in a negative way so that she is not charged with thought-crime.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I think that that could possibly happen. Julia was always interested in Winston and she seemed determined to get to know him. If she just disapeared, he would assume she was dead, when really she could be out on another job to capture another man. He would never suspect her.

    ReplyDelete
  48. I agree with Nicole...why would the Inner Party spend so much time on one individual? How did Julia get the just that Winston coulud be rebellious? Like Mrs. Moritz said, Julia hit on him first...

    ReplyDelete
  49. I agree Maria, they let it get to a point where, even though they don't need proof, they want it, they want it so that it's wrong beyond a doubt

    ReplyDelete
  50. @Abbie, i think she only cares about things that affect her directly because she only cares about her rebelling and her taking down the party, she doesn't seem to care about anyone else.

    ReplyDelete
  51. While we are having these double thoughts about julia, how can Winston trust anyone in the society? Julia, Mr. Charrington, O'Brien?

    ReplyDelete
  52. I think that if Julia was in fact a thought police, it has taken so much time for them to get arrested, because they may want to see just how many people they can get to go against the system, and how far they are willing to go.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I think that could be part of Julia's job; drawing men in. Plus wouldn't it make the book all the more interesting?

    ReplyDelete
  54. If the brother hood isnt real then what is the book?

    ReplyDelete
  55. I also noticed that when Winston was reading the book O'Brien gave him the title was WAR IS PEACE. Isn't the brotherhood supposed to be against the warring of the three superstates? I felt like the title suggested that the only way to get to peace is trough war. That doesnt seem like an idea of the brotherhood.

    ReplyDelete
  56. But in their society, they don't need justification to go against a civilian.

    ReplyDelete
  57. @Alyssa -
    What someone would know Winston was against government?

    ReplyDelete
  58. If Julia is a part of the thought police she would have turned in Obrien and the servant. Unless all these people that winston trusts are a part of the thought police, Julia would have caught so many people by now.

    ReplyDelete
  59. @megan, that's a really good point! Maybe she is just pretending to be rebellious and not care just so that she won't get in trouble.

    @Kelsi, that's a good point, do you think this is just her job for the party?

    ReplyDelete
  60. I think Moritz has a good point. From the beginning in which Julia initiated the relationship with the note, from the "I have done this with many Party members" and with the passion and what would seem like love - but under further investigation - it really isn't love. If they love each other... it would look different. She, and her behavior throughout the novel seem suspicious.

    ReplyDelete
  61. @Jack,something they made up to get people to commit these crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  62. If I lived in this society, I wouldn't trust anyone...

    ReplyDelete
  63. @Emily I don't think Winston does trust anyone completely, there's always a suspision of who is truly on his side. I think Winston was just living one day at a time.

    ReplyDelete
  64. @Abbie, it very well might be, it seems like a good possibility.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Kara - what if O'Brien is in on it too?

    ReplyDelete
  66. I remember that the book written by Goldstein he was talking about science only used to find out how to break down people, are they going to die or be brainwashed?

    ReplyDelete
  67. What if the Inner party are not killing people but torturing them to the point that they are for the party. Maybe the thought police are traitors that have had a whole different mind set.

    ReplyDelete
  68. I think it is way worse to be in prison than to just die and be put out of misery.

    ReplyDelete
  69. They have to break their most recent generation so that the future are subordinate. If they even let a trace of rebellion survive on, then it has the potential to grow and grow.

    ReplyDelete
  70. The government really wants to screw up the intellectuality of the society. They create a society where nobody can trust each other because of secret unknown thought police around.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Jack - maybe the book is one of the Party's tools. It might just be some sick joke, the whole thing, you know.

    ReplyDelete
  72. I agree with michaela, that is a very tough decision. I think that many people would rather die instead of being imprisoned for the rest of his/her life.

    ReplyDelete
  73. natalie- but why would all these people be after winston? He is one man that really hasnt done anything that bad.

    ReplyDelete
  74. What is real in the society of 1984 and what is just setups by the government? Is everything real or a set up?

    ReplyDelete
  75. Zach - the "hint" of rebellion seems like a hopeless idea, if everyone Winston has trusted is actually against him. Are all the "hints" of rebellion fake?

    ReplyDelete
  76. @sydney but its so true and raw they admit the have no reason to fight. explain how there culture is so violent is so real so it makes no sense.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Thats a good point Natalie. It seems like everything is controlled by the party, if this is true, there would be no way of changing and escaping.

    ReplyDelete
  78. I agree with Kara and Emily. When the people are imprisoned, they could be totured or brainwashed to eventually become part of the party. Maybe everyone in the party was imprisoned at one point in time, and thats how Big Brother is able to monitar them.

    ReplyDelete
  79. @ Rebecca -
    I don't think they would ACTUALLY fight if it was a fake war. I think that they would just fake the war...no soldiers.

    ReplyDelete
  80. I think that there is a "war", but it is more of a stalemate like The Book said, it just uses up excess resources.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Mikeala, what if the "soldiers" are just people who have been vaporized?

    ReplyDelete
  82. What, so they just drop bombs randomly on each other? The whole idea of a staged war seems completely plausible. The government wants power. A war instills terror into the people. They will obey BB. A disgusting concept of a staged war. How could people just kill one another? Why is there no problem with death?

    ReplyDelete
  83. The bombs being dropped would be pretty peculiar, though, if it was a fake war.

    ReplyDelete
  84. I dont think the war is real. I think it's a way to keep people scared so they stay loyal to Oceania because it's the only form of "protection". Also, the majority of the bombs are dropped on the proles, right? And the proles are the ones who are most likely to commit crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  85. In the book though it says the war is ono avery small scale for a very small area. The government just exaggerated the scael of the war.

    ReplyDelete
  86. What is the upside of faking a war?
    Why do they want the citizens afraid?

    ReplyDelete
  87. I think it's possible that the vaporized people turn into the soldiers, or the thought police. They could be brainwashed or tortured to the point that they switch sides, and support the system. The government in this book is all about letting the people see what they want them to see, so we have no way of knowing with all that propeganda.

    ReplyDelete
  88. @Corey The Party could be dropping the bombs in order to make the people fearful

    ReplyDelete
  89. @Maria, so do you think that the bombs being dropped for "War" is just a cover up for trying to keep the people in the proles in line?

    ReplyDelete
  90. We talked about this in history. censorship, I think it starts with people not caring and not wanting to know what is really going on and then the government feels that they can hide essentially everything, like big brother and the inner party.

    ReplyDelete
  91. I think war is just hating the other country not actual fighting. Obviously Eurasia and Oceania weren't in a "real" war because suddenly they Oceania was in a war with Eastasia in a matter of seconds.

    ReplyDelete
  92. I agree with Becca and they may decide not to tell us things for the security of the nation

    ReplyDelete
  93. @Corey- maybe the government is using the bombs to scare the civilians, to make the war (if it is fake)more real while protecting the power of BIG BROTHER

    ReplyDelete
  94. @Jack, well. it could be true, but they want it to seem real. if it were too fake, no one would go with it. i think there may be an actual brotherhood out there, but not the one winston knew of.

    ReplyDelete
  95. For all the information that people know in this book, they really don't know much.

    And the possibility of the American government lying to us... that's insane.
    If they are - just think of how real we think our world is.
    What if it is all a lie?
    I don't think I could handle it.

    ReplyDelete
  96. We know how much the government in 1984 lies to the people, because we read about it. We have NO way of knowing what our government lies about or hides from us, because it's not a story, it's real life.

    ReplyDelete